|
Calloway Gardens - Georgia USA Host
- Greg Fanelli |
||
|
||
|
The following is a summary of this years meeting by Don Johnson: |
||
There are numerous classification systems to document results of treatment of knee injuries, such as the Cincinnati knee scale. The main problem is the lack of specificity for the PCL . The IKDC form has been universally accepted for the ACL - but there is no rotational tibial measurement, crepitus evaluation is irrelevant, there is one line only for the surgical technique, and finally the difference between nearly normal and abnormal is ambiguous. Jonathon Beacon investigated how he could improve the recording of his results. He contacted the Swiss group of Bitplane AG who have developed a universal database that is already being used in orthopedics. The result is that a PCL specific database is being developed. You can still enter the IKDC data, but in addition you can enter other items that you think are important, or in other words you can customize the database. Database - IDES 4.0 order this database from Bitplane AG holm@bitplane.ch fax (01) 445 15 41 Jurgen Hole is the computer programmer.
The most common meniscal tear found in the isolated PCL deficient knee was a vertical longitudinal tear of the lateral meniscus. This is important information, since this tear pattern is repairable. The conventional literature has stated that the medial meniscal degenerative tear is the common tear.
38 isolated PCL deficient patients were evaluated at a mean of 13.4 years post injury. Among the 30 patients with normal menisci, 84% had occasional pain and 56% occasional swelling. The longer the follow up, the more degenerative changes are seen on x-ray. The prognosis of the isolated PCL injury varies widely, with some asymptomatic patients having normal knee function. paper in AJSM p306 Vol. 24 No 3 1996
The value of this may not be for the routine case, but maybe for revisions with hardware in the proximal tibia. Richard Holtbys experience with this was, it was difficult for both the surgeon and the patient, and the results were only mediocre. Bergfeld also presented some basic science lab work that found that the structure that reduces the post displacement of the tibial with internal rotation was the medial ligament and posterior capsule.
The double semi-t and gracilis is about the same strength as the quads graft, i.e. about 4,000 Newtons
Technique: Posteromedial portal to debride the PCL. Use the image intensifier to monitor the k-wire and the drill bit. In an isolated PCL he uses one femoral tunnel, and a composite of 2 semi-t and 2 gracilis grafts. If he has to do a PLI, he uses 3 grafts for the PCL and the other gracilis for the postero lateral Larson technique. He uses the screw and claw fixation on the femur with the bollard on the tibia. He fixes the grafts at 30* Uses the IKDC format and telos stress x-ray. To find the point on the lateral femur - use the LCL and varus stress to locate the epicondyle. The x-ray may also be necessary.
He used a force gauge and tested the PCL with stress, using various reconstruction techniques. The most anatomical reconstruction is the 2 bundle technique, and to tension the AL bundle at 90* and PM bundle at 0* This procedure is technically demanding, but is the future. Quotes "The PCL is the senior author of the knee" Shelton - If it seems logical, it usually is logical McGuire " Dr Tim Deakon is spring loaded for NO"
Maybe the ACL is responsible for the decreases of the posterior displacement of the tibial in the PCL deficient knee when tested in internal rotation. Bergfeld felt that it was the MCL and posterior capsule, based on cadaver cutting studies. Does anyone know what is the long term morbidity of harvesting the hamstrings? There is no literature Quote "Did the synthetic ligament fail us or did we fail the synthetic ligament?"
Results: 70-80% good results Many failures are due to missing the PLI. 20 % were unhappy with synthetic reconstruction Several biopsies showed ingrowth of fibrous tissue Failed PCL reconstruction - you have missed the PLI !! My results with 30 cases have 30% early failure. I think that this may be due to trying to convert a open procedure to an arthroscopic procedure J.P. does not excise the PCL remnant, but leaves it there to fall back over the synthetic. The synthetic is buried in tissue, and is eventually incorporated. This neoligament then becomes the main support. I think that the concept of burying one limb of the synthetic in the acute situation is a little like using the Hughston internal suture to support the PCL during the healing phase. It certainly makes more sense than using an olecranizing pin or an external fixator.
Achilles tendon allograft is split in 2, and the tendon split in 2 Now 4 tunnels are made in the femur. The functional results are good. And I thought I had a problem drilling 2 tunnels. The problem is the tensioning, they do it all in extension. The AL should be in flexion and the PM in extension .They have studied the anatomy but not the kinematics. Greg Fanelli says put in a big bundle of allograft Achilles i.e. 32 mm footprint, and you solve the problem. Remember, the meniscal femoral ligament can be as much as 35% of the footprint.
Berg reported in the Journal of Arthroscopy in 1995, that the only graft is the only one that avoids the killer tunnel angle in the posterior tibia. Results and problems The tunnels are put in the wrong place. There is poor fixation technique. The plugs can move and graft become loose. Allograft bone plug may fracture How to revise the failed PCL graft - use the only graft to avoid the posterior tibial screw. Cooper uses the Larson PLI reconstruction with the semi-t. Most of these cases are revisions, The PCL from Hell. Note: He doesn'tt like to mobilize post op - he uses an extension splint for 3 weeks He showed some cases with 10 mm post displacement , down from 22 pre-op. These were honest results Total lateral menisectomy accentuates any lateral instability, consider meniscal allograft Still, he has not achieved <5mm of displacement, and has not convinced me of the value of the procedure for the routine PCL. I would agree that for revision, this procedure has value. Use the patellar tendon allograft, and measures closely to avoid the bone plug sticking out of the femur For the medial instability, he uses a modified Bosworth, by using a distally based semi-t and advance the MCL attachment into the femur with screw and washer. The posterior capsule is 50% and the pop-fib ligament is 50% of the Postero lateral stability.
This is an open procedure. We should not try to adapt to an arthroscopic situation where we debride all the residual posterior cruciate ligament. The Y ligament was developed to address the the synthetic Operate on the combined injuries only, PLI and PCL combination. Now the AL bundle can be reconstructed with one limb of the Y and the other limb can reconstruct the popliteus, to correct the PLI. The open surgery leaves this remnant of the PCL and this buries and do both the PCL and PLI
More tidbits from discussion: Knee stability occurs with internal rotation of the tibia. The knee unwraps in external rotation and becomes unstable. Therefore any increase in external rotation is abnormal. Postero-lateral corner Passive structures -capsule pop-fib ligament LCL active structures - popliteus - resists external rotation The popliteus is often torn at the mt junction. The posterolateral bundle is always deficient in PLRI The Y ligament is a static reconstruction. Holds the tibia in neutral rotation.
Technique tip: Mark the outline of the lateral condyle in a marker pen and take the center of the circle to find the epicondyle. Tensioning - pull until the fibers are taught , but not too tight, make simple adjustments in flexion and rotation.
Figure 1 Dr John Bergfeld demonstrating the posterior inly graft with the patellar tendon graft.
Figure 2 The Telos stress x-ray showing 13 mm of posterior displacement in a previous arthroscopic PCL reconstruction. The problem is to remove the posterior screw in order to drill a new tunnel. The posterior onlay graft avoids the problem.
The angle of the femoral tunnels going inside out is the best angle. J.P. measures his results with telos at 150N and 250N stress. Lars results The ligament becomes flat on the back of the tibial with the open weave. This open weave also allows for ingrowth of fibrous tissue to augment the graft. 31% were isolated PCLs acute -89% were <5mm chronic 75% <5mm IKDC - mechanical results better than the functional results The acute results 90 vs 60% in the chronic Cooper results better with isolated level Level 1 = 83% Level 2 75% level 3 66% Poor results with chronic and with the collateral ligament Therefore, think early repair with Lars reinforcement. Think osteotomy of the tibia when any thrust is present. Arthroscopic vs open - no real difference in outcome after 4 months In acute cases one bundle is all that is necessary. But why not put in semi-t with bioscrew!!
Tip - 15 mm of posterior displacement means a combined injury.
indications: revisions, older patients, or difficult / unusual cases 11 cases - done with the image intensifier and the over the bottom technique 2 re-operations for loosening most were Cooper level 2 and 3 many were revisions and difficult cases " the PCL from Hell" 9 patients - 6 improved low lysholm scales most 2+ PD Telos: only 1 was <5mm - overall poor objective results, but the patients were happier than with the onlay graft. He was comparing his Trevira results to his previous unhappy experience with the patellar tendon onlay graft, that resulted in prolonged morbidity, with a painful and stiff knee.
50% of patients had a remote anteromedial tibial plateau fracture. Results: all osteotomies healed cinnci scale - pre-op to post-op 66 to 81 all patients had positive recurvatum and external rotation test the osteotomy was above the tubercle and surgibone was used to fill the opening wedge.
J.P. put a fishing lead on the tibial tubercle and did a skyline x-ray in neutral and external rotation. He then measure the angle of external rotation. The knee was flexed at 60*.
Internal rotation winds up the ligaments and tightens the knee. Watanobe in Arthrosopy Journal in 1993 discussed the functional anatomy of the posterolateral corner Measured 120 normal knees - total arc is 30* at 30 of knee flexion - total arc is 23* at 90* of knee flexion All loose PLI knees there was increased in IR and ER He compared the post op with the normal opposite side when the posterolateral corner is loose the center of rotation moves to the medial side. This increases the strain on the PCL and may eventually loosens.
The Telos device uses 15 kilopascals or 134 newtons or 30 #, to displace the tibial posteriorly. Did the quad active test for the KT-1000 and then the stress x-ray. He noted an inter observer error of 1mm There was a lot of discussion about how to draw lines on the x-ray to measure. Angus Strover has a unique method of line measurements. We all agreed that we need a new method of drawing lines or a new template.
He presented 79 cases of unoperated PCL injuries measured with the template on the stress x-ray. The difficulty is with the positioning of the template on the x-ray. 2 separate examiners on 2 separate occasions measured each x-ray. The four sets of numbers were correlated statistically. Unfortunately, there was poor correlation. The message is that we need to have a better method of drawing the lines on the x-ray to measure the posterior displacement of the tibia.
Acute Lars synthetic reconstruction ( augmentation) gives us: Reduction Fixation Early mobilization Scaffolding Review of literature on knee dislocation supports acute surgical treatment.
Discussion In the clinical exam it is important to feel the end point of the posterior drawer You need the 2 measurements at 150 and 250 N to look for the compliance or the clinical end point. Must get the 2 numbers to look at compliance.
His point was that in some of the new treatments for the PCL, we must think in terms of ethics. We need to have good outcome studies on any new procedure before we change our treatment. |